Pollution fears over homes site

First published in News by

VILLAGERS in Kingham are worried that new houses could be built on contaminated land containing arsenic, mercury and lead.

Plans have been submitted to West Oxfordshire District Council for 16 new homes on a former landfill site and gravel pit which was in-filled with clinker and household refuse in the mid 1900’s.

Lisa Warne from Fowlers Road said: “Surprisingly no recommendation or indication is given that the contamination will be removed before the homes are built. Moreover the developer has suggested that the contaminated soil will be covered over by importing topsoil onto the site, meaning that the contamination will still exist once the houses are sold. Eight of the 16 proposed houses are deemed to be affordable housing for young families in the village. I would be horrified if the plans went through as they are.”

Clerk of Kingham Parish Council Nicole Marina said: “We have discussed this application in committee and will be calling on a consultant to help us decide on our recommendation to the district council. We will be looking into the plans very carefully because of the concerns.”

Area development manager for the council, Phil Shaw said: “We always consult our contamination officer with planning matters of this type before making any recommendations.” Mr Shaw explained that there are a number of options available to the developer which included removing the contamination from the site or capping the area and sealing it so nothing leaks into the environment.

A recent survey of the site revealed levels of Arsenic, Mercury & Lead in excess of government safety guidelines. The plans for development are due to go before the planning committee in early September.

Call in with Kemp and Kemp (Abingdon) - 01865 240001. (planning agent)

Comments (2)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

10:42am Sat 16 Aug 14

Rita Jelfs says...

The previous owner of the land should have been be required to remove the depth of soil containing the mercury, arsenic and lead, prior to selling the land to the developer. It could take millions to clear the land.
The previous owner of the land should have been be required to remove the depth of soil containing the mercury, arsenic and lead, prior to selling the land to the developer. It could take millions to clear the land. Rita Jelfs
  • Score: 0

10:44am Sat 16 Aug 14

Rita Jelfs says...

The previous owner of the site has the responsibility to remove soil containing lead, arsenic and mercury prior to them selling the site to a developer. Because this is likely to be very expensive.
The previous owner of the site has the responsibility to remove soil containing lead, arsenic and mercury prior to them selling the site to a developer. Because this is likely to be very expensive. Rita Jelfs
  • Score: 0

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree